Thursday, February 21, 2008

Spy Gate

Before you skip past this to what I wrote about Max Starks, I'm not conducting a witch hunt and I'm also not condoning what Bill Belichick did. I'm simply answering a question.

(By the by, my official stance on Spy Gate is that I don't think it really helped the Patriots, but any way that can be found to punish them is okay by me. If they did get a bunch of help by videotaping the Rams walkthrough the Saturday before the Super Bowl, then you've gotta take that out of their trophy case. Not literally, but you have to consider them to be 2-2 in Super Bowls in this decade. That still makes them far better than any other team in the '00s, so they're still the team of the decade, but that makes them about as cool as the '70s Cowboys... which is another team that I like to see suffer. So, the circle is complete.)

I've heard this question a few times since Senator Arlen Specter (take a bow, Pennsylvanians!) started sticking his nose into the Spy Gate incident.

The question is: "What the fuck is Congress doing messing with the NFL? Don't they have more important things to do?"

Well, the answer to the second question is, "Yes. They probably do have more important things to do." The answer to the first question is a little longer.

The NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL are all monopolies. Specifically, the NFL is the only entity that produces a product of its kind: NFL football. However, the NFL is made up of 32 teams. In normal business situations, all 32 teams would negotiate with networks as individuals and TV contracts would vary. In a normal business situation, if all 32 teams decided to negotiate together, TV contracts would be fatter, because there would be no competition. That would be an Anti-Trust issue, which falls under the jurisdiction of Congress. To put it in simpler terms, if Dell, HP, Compaq, and Gateway all got together and said, "As of today, all laptops cost $2,000 and all desktops cost $1,500," no one would be questioning why Congress was getting involved, because that would be a bunch of big companies getting together to form a monopoly and fixing their prices.

(Editor's Note: Toshiba and Sony would have declared that they don't compete on price and would have left themselves out of the above conversation.)

The NFL is allowed to negotiate as one entity without Anti-Trust ramifications because of an agreement they signed with Congress in the 50's. The agreement states that the NFL is exempt from Anti-Trust laws so long as their product is readily available to the masses. The DirecTV Sunday Ticket thing and the black-out date thing are knotty areas in this agreement and Congress is pushing for black-outs to go away and Sunday Ticket to be available to anyone.

One of the implicit parts of that agreement is that the NFL is an entertainment entity that produces professional football games that are fair, played on an even field, and free of cheating. So, Spy Gate makes it seem like that last part isn't true. If that last part isn't true, it's in violation of the Anti-Trust laws, and it's the business of Congress to look into it.

Baseball has the same basic agreement (though it's a little sweeter in some areas), so that's why Congress is talking to Roger Clemens and Mark McGuire.

News on Starks, Other Stuff

I think that I mentioned somewhere in this blog that I believed the Steelers were going to let Max Starks walk in free agency. Well, I'm dumb. They placed the transition tag on him. In my defense, they're dumber than I am, because the transition tag isn't worth anything.

Anyone that has the transition tag placed on them gets paid the average of the top 10 players at their position. Tackle is not broken up into left and right tackle, so we're basically paying him like the 10th best left tackle in the game. And he's not worth that.

Plus which, the transition tag only gives the Steelers right of first refusal on a contract offer made by another team. If they let him walk, they get nothing. If they are forced to let him walk, they get nothing. You may recall the transition tag from the 2006 offseason. The Seahaws placed it on Steve Hutchinson shortly after they lost Super Bowl XL to the Steelers (yep, that's right, we won that Super Bowl). Minnesota came along and offered Hutchinson a contract with what lawyers like to call "poison pills" in it. It said that the contract was voided if Hutchinson didn't play half of his games in the state of Minnesota that season, that he'd be due huge roster bonuses if he played half his games in the state of Washington, stuff like that. Seattle couldn't match the contract, so they lost him and got nothing.

While they were busy getting nothing in return, they were on the salary cap books for paying Hutchinson top-10 money for a guard. Since that time, no one has used the transition tag on anybody. You'll also remember that the Bungholes (I find it interesting that spell check underlines Bungles in red, but leaves Bungholes alone) also lost Takeo Spikes to the Bills because they designated them as their transition player.

The interesting thing is that, by doing this, the Steelers can prove just how a dumb a move it was to risk paying Starks about $8.5 million for just this season by sitting around and doing nothing. I think it's pretty unlikely that anyone's going to offer him a contract, since the only type of contract another team would offer is a big one that the Steelers wouldn't match... and no one's going to pay top dollar for a back-up right tackle that lost his job to a dude named after part of your ass. They'll end up either having to sign him to a long term deal or eating that big cap number and watching him walk away next offseason. If they don't franchise him, that is.

Wiki does a better job of explaining the transition tag than I did, so here's that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transition_tag.

I also heard that Kevin Colbert said he used the transition tag on Starks because he thought the Steelers wouldn't be able to match any offer that Alan Faneca got on the open market. Really, Kevin? You're sure about that? I thought the Steelers front office wrote off all chances of Faneca suiting up for the Steelers in 2008 in July 2007 (if not earlier) like the rest of us did. So, that's another level of stupid.

At any rate, they're probably going to sign Starks to a long term deal. Max Starks. A guy who pretty well stunk in 2006, was benched at the beginning of 2007, and somehow ended up playing left tackle towards the end of 2007. Maybe Marvel Smith is hurt worse than we think and the Steelers brain trust believes Starks can be a good left tackle. I don't believe that, but I've been wrong before -- like in 2004 when I thought the Steelers were dumb for drafting Roethlisberger, 2005 when I thought they were dumb for drafting Heath, and when I thought that the Duce Staley and Cedrick Wilson signings were both "good pick-ups."

By the way: This is only the beginning. I foresee a very busy offseason for our favorite team. (Mark this one down, too. It could end up being a tremendously dumb statement.)

Sunday, February 10, 2008

Pro Bowl Review

I realize that it was an exhibition game. I realize that it didn't matter at all. I understand that the players were, in theory, playing for game checks... for roughly $40,000 a pop for the winners. And these are Pro Bowl guys. $40,000 is a long night at a club or half a night at a strip bar if you're Pacman Jones. As I mentioned in my Super Bowl Review, it's all about pride and determination at this point.

And, in my opinion, there were a lot of proud guys out there today. A lot more players than you'd expect were actually trying in the game. It was fairly intense for an All-Star game. Though I believe that the NFC cheated because they didn't play everyone they could have and kept Adrian Peterson in at tailback for almost the entire game (and that guy is, hands down, the greatest player in the NFL, and it's not even close. Everything that I had seen from him was subjective, thinking about how to stop him. But, really, the only way to stop him is to have two or three guys in his way. If he gets one-on-one with another player, even if it's one of the best in the league, like it was today, he's going to win. He's... he's just amazing. Best. Player. In. The. NFL. Period. That fucking guy is unbelievable. I honestly wish I had had recorded the Pro Bowl so that I could watch him play against the best and utterly humiliate the best repeatedly.)

So, I noticed two things Steeler-related in this game.
  1. If the Steelers want to move to the 4-3 defense, they need to trade Casey Hampton. He was forced to work as an "under" tackle in the 4-3 defense today and was completely lost. Really. They can't even keep him on the roster if they move to the Cover 2.
  2. James Harrison looked about as lost. He signed a contract extension before the 2007 season, so the Steelers have three options:
  • Release him and take the cap hit.
  • Trade him.
  • Have him gain some weight and become a defensive end.
This game helped me accept the fact that the 2008 season is the season in which the defense stops being LeBeau's defense and starts becoming Tomlin's defense. It's interesting that a team would want to tear down the #1 defense in 2007 and re-build it, but anyone who watched all the games know the issues that face the Steelers and their defense.

We drafted a 4-3 linebacker in Lawrence Timmons and a 4-3 end in Lamar Woodley in the last draft. We're going to draft some more guys like Woodley and Timmons in this year's draft. The change is coming.

I knew it was coming, but it really hit me full-force today.

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Super Bowl Review

I was hungover for about two days after the Super Bowl. I'm pretty sure I wrote an e-mail to a sports columnist on Sunday night that used the word "douchebag" 26 times. And, then, it was kinda like, "The Super Bowl was soooooo Sunday."

At any rate, I have to say that I was pretty much right about everything. The Giants did what I said they needed to do. And then some. I've never seen Brady that harassed. I've never seen him that frustrated. I've never seen him that confused. It's a lot like the look someone has on their face when they dominate a video game on Easy for four months, then decide, "How much tougher can Moderate be? Fuck it. I'm gonna try Expert." They constantly glance down at the controller, they furiously pound on the buttons, they stare wide-eyed at the TV and anyone that happens to be watching, then they ultimately hit the re-set button. The Patriots couldn't hit the re-set button on Sunday and I think it left them shell-shocked.

But, the big thing I didn't foresee was Eli Manning and the Giants offense coming through in the clutch and the Patriots choking. All the breaks that went the Patriots way during their run -- especially during the 2001 season and during the course of this season -- they all went the Giants way in the Super Bowl. Some dude named David Tyree made an impossible catch on a ball that's picked off 9 times out of 10 thrown by a guy that's about as mobile as Half Dome after he escaped three linemen simultaneously. On third down. The bounces went their way, the Patriots dropped a couple of sure interceptions, and, really, the Giants just wanted it more.

Ever have one of those days where you're so tired that you're basically trying to think of all the things you absolutely, positively need to do before you're allowed to sleep? Everyone on the Patriots had that look about them halfway through the third quarter.

I just still can't believe that, basically, the Giants out Patrioted the Patriots. I read this on a message board somewhere and I think it sums everything up nicely:

"On the Patriots final drive, when defensive tackle Jay Alford busted through the line absolutely smacked Tom Brady, dropping him for a sack, he had a dazed look about him. It was as though, in the past four months, he had forgotten he was playing football and was rudely awakened."

So, really, there's only one thing that still needs to be covered...

Belichick and a good number of the guys on the Patriots, including Junior Seau and Tedy Bruschi, who needed to play defense, left the field with one second left.

Now, in the grand scheme of things, this isn't a huge deal. No one's really making a huge deal out of it. PTI and Around the Horn probably had three minutes devoted to it, but it's pretty much been swept away. The popular excuse is that no one from the Patriots knew that there was one second left and, by the time someone informed them, none of them cared.

From an objective prospective, how important is it that every guy on the Patriots stays on the field and congratulates every guy on the Giants? These guys are professionals, right? So long as there are enough people left to finish the game, that's all that really matters. For official purposes, there were 46 guys active for the game and 7 inactives. Belichick could've run out the same 11 guys out there and had them play both offense and defense the whole game and there would have been nothing illegal about it. And, he could've had them take the field and said, "Good luck, boys. I'm going to the bar." All the NFL needed, for official purposes, was that 11 guys were on the field on offense and defense for the whole game.

It's not like anyone for New York had their feelings hurt or that Belichick refused to take the team out for banana splits at Dairy Queen because his players didn't line up, slap five with the Giants players, and say, "good game, good game, good game," repeatedly. There was nothing illegal or emotionally scarring about it. And, I'm not even going to go the route of, "They set an absolutely horrendous example for kids growing up and playing sport. I had to explain to little Jimmy why they left the field early and didn't congratulate the other team on the victory." This isn't the first time your kids going to be disappointed by sports. If he is irrevocably damaged by something he saw on TV at the end of the Super Bowl, he's got bigger fish to fry psychologically.

What the Patriots did shows a lack of respect and a complete lack of class.

When a bunch of guys beat the shit out of each other and attempt to kill each other for three hours, they form a kind of bond. They know, somewhere deep in their psyche that this is just a job, but most of their motivation comes from pride and determination. Especially in the post-season, when a game check is far less than what they make during the regular season. So, other than Brady or Manning or Strahan, who are all marketable and would stand to make some money endorsing products with some championship hardware behind him (seriously, is Justin Tuck going to start doing Mastercard commercials? Did the thought of that motivate him in any way? No.), other than those few players, no one was motivated by money. Just pride and determination.

What did the Giants get for their tremendous showing of pride and determination? Well, shit yeah, they got rings, t-shirts, hats, and nice, shiny Lombardi Trophy, but they didn't get the respect and humility of the team they played against.

Is that scarring? Do they care now? Probably not. They're not a bunch of whining assholes like Mike Holmgren and the Seahawks (I heard something on the radio where someone was still bitching about Super Bowl XL -- which we won, btw -- and, shortly thereafter, I read an article that said Holmgren was still pissed about having his General Manager responsibilities taken away in 200-fucking-3. Seriously. Give it up.) At any rate, the Giants could probably give two shits about it right now.

It's not life-altering, but it is a move that is fraught with douche baggery.

Look, I have to say that I'm glad the Patriots finished the season 16-0. There. I said it. In a regular season that had a lot of pitfalls and some pretty shitty storylines -- one of which involved the Browns (get it? Shitty? Browns?) -- New England gave us something to watch. And someone to hate.

Think about it. Can you remember anything better from the regular season, anything that got more coverage and spurred more debate than the weekly quest for perfection? Cleveland's a great story, but you can't talk about it much. "Hey, Bill. Cleveland's kicking ass. Did you see that coming?" No, Ted. No I didn't. End of conversation. "But, say there, Bill. The Packers are a terrific story and Brett Favre is playing like a kid again." Yep. He sure is. He's the Brett Favre of football, alright. "What about the Patriots?" Oh, well, they're a bunch of dicks. I think they're overrated and... what about this Spygate thing? Think that's gonna blow up in their faces during the Super Bowl? What about in the offseason? I think Brady's going to hit 55 touchdowns. He's slowed down the last couple of weeks, but he'll come back around. Did you see what they did to Joe Gibbs and the Redskins...?

That got us through the regular season. Then, all the post-season games rocked (admit it, if your favorite team wasn't involved in the Jacksonville game, you'd have said it was a hell of a game). And the Super Bowl was one of the all-time best. I'd put it right up there with the Broncos-Packers Super Bowl and the Bills-Giants Super Bowl.

But, enough about the good things the Patriots did. One of the reasons that they spurred on so much conversation and debate is that they were so hated throughout the entire season. Every non-Patriot fan wanted them to lose. And, no doubt, there were some serious Concern Rays at work in the Super Bowl.

So, they go through every game of the regular season, thumbing their noses at the Spygate situation, blowing out overmatched opponents and generally acting like douche bags. They were douche bags to such a great extent that it proliferated to their entire fan base, made fans out of people that turned in their Boston Douche Bag Fan card years ago, and made it so that you couldn't talk to someone about the Patriots until you were absolutely positive that they weren't a Pats fan.

Teams starting gearing up for them at the midway point of the season. Every game became their Super Bowl. They wanted to be the team that knocked the juggernaut off its mighty perch. But, the Pats kept winning. They kept being snide, arrogant bastards, and they kept empowering their fan base to do the same. And, if there's one thing that's worse than an insufferable douche bag, it's an insufferable douche bag that can back it up.

For eighteen straight weeks and about two months of playing against opponents that treated the game like the only game of the season that mattered, the New England Patriots backed up their insufferable douche baggery with stellar play. A good deal of luck was involved, but, for the most part, they were just better than everyone else. They were so much better, everyone forgot that the Colts were the defending champs and Indy snuck their way through the season at 13-3 with half a roster.

Here's the thing. They fucked up the ultimate revenge by walking off the field early. If Bruschi and Belichick and Moss and Brady and Harrison and every single one of those cold-hearted, motherless, baby punching bastards had gone up to every single member of the Giants and, whole heartedly (or at least gave the appearance of sincerity) said, "Great job. Congratulations."... most of us would've said, "Huh. I guess they aren't such douche bags after all. They really were just better than everyone and they were playing to win. They came up short this time. They'll be back strong next season."

Instead, they walked off early and everyone had the right to say, "HA! You lost, bitches! That's right, run away! You were douche bags before, but now you're just loser douche bags!" And the biggest, most insufferable douche bag of them all lead the charge. And didn't acknowledge the douche baggery in the post-game press conference.

And, that, my friends, is why the 2007 Patriots will go into the record book as an incredibly talented group of insufferable douche bags. I, for one, am glad that we don't have to deal with these fuckers for the next 40 years like we've been addled with the Dolphins. After all, they weren't douche bags to start with: They just got surly with age and champagne.

Here's the worst part:

I really, really, really, really wanted to hate Randy Moss after this game. In the past, he's quit on his teammates, he's left games early, he's been a locker room cancer and he ran over a meter maid. Prior to the 2007 season, the man was just a colossally acerbic dick. During the 2007 season, everyone started praising him. First came the stories out of the Patriots camp. Randy's doing well, he's a smart guy, he's not quitting on routes. Then stories from the regular season. Look at Randy blocking down the field, here he's acting as a decoy is going all out even though he knows he's not getting the ball, he's so humble, giving the ball to a teammate after scoring a touchdown. Then the post-season. Randy's not getting catches but he doesn't care, he's happy to be winning, he wants to retire as a Patriot, he's still blocking downfield and finishing every route strong. I saw him starting to give up, as all the New England players did at one point or another in the Super Bowl and I thought, "There's the true Randy. You can take the douche out of the bag, but you can't take the douche bag out of Randy Moss' soul." When Belichick rushed off the field with time still remaining on the clock, I actually looked for Moss (HD is awesome), hoping he'd be scurrying away as well. But, there he was, on the sidelines, looking around confused, as if to say, "Hey... uh... we still have time on the clock. Everyone sees that, right? Uh... guys?" And he stayed on the field. And he congratulated the Giants.

Ah, well. I suppose my faith in humanity was restored in that moment. So... that's good, I guess.

One other thing: The officiating was simply amazing in this game. It wasn't perfect, but it was damn-near perfect. Great job by the zebras in this one. We're too quick to criticize them and we usually don't say anything nice when they win.

Great job, boys. Way to make me look like an ass by saying that the officiating could play a factor in the game.